Once again we have boys for previous errors Generation stand up straight. No wonder the bill was drafted almost exclusively of so much earners of the older generations. Should high earners pay the same percentage as we average income, unemployment insurance would have no financial problems. It is simply cynical, if individual bourgeois politicians in letters publicly taken the position that a particularly good aspect is the LACI revision that would have to assume that the future under 30 years of each paper. People who say such things have probably hardly fear of falling ever in such a situation. Therefore, this measure was not proposed for all yes, but only for us young. A training Make to educate himself and build something that will only be forced in the case of dismissal to to do inferior work? No thanks, we did not deserve it! Concealed is also said that young people will slip off after the revision in accordance with earlier social assistance. Thus, while the unemployment insurance savings, but increase the social expenditure of the municipalities and cantons. For such a pseudo-reconstruction of our unemployment insurance decided I say NO.
0 comments:
Post a Comment