The city Wil has a new police regulations. Measures such as deportation of undesirable persons, and video surveillance of public space are now possible.
The City Council has approved by 22 votes to 10 against last Thursday, the police regulations of the city of Wil, with some amendments. All but one articles were accepted but did some controversial Provisions to controversy. During two hours, supporters and opponents battled for more or less regulated security. In the Tonhalle ruled two different opinions. Both the Greens and the SP were prowil for less working police regulations and then provided appropriate and rejected requests. (Prowil Green) For Michael Sarbach it was even difficult to understand that there must be a police regulation, and finally was settled everything important already at the cantonal and federal level.
In the original design it was about creating a police regulations for the city of Wil, raise the sense of security that the citizens will. It was, for example, measures such as deportation of undesirable persons, and video surveillance of public space. But the placarding on public and private land was disputed.
develop regulations
Dario Sulzer (SP) was sure that Wil had until now no police regulations, as the city is no need. It deceived the only security against the population, it gives no protection. This opinion was also Michael Sarbach (Green prowil). He added that he was actually for the safety and cleanliness in the city of Wil, but the rules must be developed in more detail in this regard. The Christian Democrats, the FDP and SVP welcomed the new regulations that will achieve, especially preventive effect. Mark Hilbert (FDP) was clearly against a police state, but the freedom to hear where it could harm them. He was clear that to fight with the police regulations, only the symptoms and not the cause. Next
still had the issue of financing of the cameras in public spaces. This is not an issue, "said Andreas Widmer, the City Council, as it the first time today to vote on the regulations and not later because of the costs. All the groups were of the opinion that you do not need any rules, if people would only look and act. However, this was difficult to implement, since the moral courage of individuals is low. Thus, the rejection of applications of the SP and the Greens were rejected prowil.
Almost all applications accepted
In the detailed advice several applications were made to individual articles. Rejected was a proposal that is punishable by unauthorized placarding only the person who hangs the poster in question, said the organizer of the event was not to prosecute but. A majority found that the amendment that the distribution of leaflets or programs, and recruiting services to or from ideological organizations to assume the increased public use is. A large majority of the House stadträtlichen followed the arguments, after which the product to expulsion of individuals or groups get important preventive effect. Subsequently rejected the request of Michael was Sarbach (Green prowil) to remove the signs article. Also a majority found the application of Mark Hilbert (FDP), which would have banned the consumption of alcohol on school grounds and the drinking of alcohol by young people under the age of 18 years on public property between midnight and 7 clock in the morning, the city council can approve exceptions . approved by the parliament, a proposal that littering, throwing away the impurity and leaving behind any kind of waste on public and private land, prohibited. The addition ordered to keep the dogs advisory commission was endorsed. It states that dogs must be kept so that they do not endanger yourself or others or harass.
5.7. '08, Wiler Zeitung, Simone Greuter
0 comments:
Post a Comment